Au Meng Nam & Anor v Ung Yak Chew & Ors
 5 MLJ 136
Summary of the Court’s Decision
(2) (per Raus JCA; Hasan JCA concurring)
The findings of the learned trial judge did not solely turn on a question of fact. It was a mixed question of fact and law. Thus, even if the findings of the learned trial judge were based on factual ground it did not absolve this court of doing its duty as an appellate court (see paragraph 38 of the Judgment in MLJ).
Meanings of the underlined words.
|did not solely||bukan semata-mata|
|turn on||berkaitan dengan|
|a question of fact||persoalan tentang fakta.|
|mixed question of fact and law||gabungan persoalan fakta dan undang-undang|
|were based on||berdasarkan|
|factual ground||alasan berdasarkan fakta|
|it did not absolve this court||ia tidak membebaskan mahkamah ini|
|of doing its duty||melaksanakan tanggungjawabnya|